Best Cpu for Am3+

Best Cpu for Am3+ – The fact that AM3+ CPUs still hold their ground amidst the more powerful Ryzen and Intel processors say a lot about its capabilities. They are widely available at lower prices, but our reviews should tell you how viable and effective they still are. Some of them can prove to be even better than more expensive ones.

At a first glance, investing in a top-of-the-line AM3+ processor sounds like a great idea. The prices are low, performance figures aren’t that different and you don’t have to upgrade your entire PC.

However, there are downsides as well. Power consumption, heating issues, middling gaming performance, and the fact that technology is about five years old.

ROUND UP

If you’re building a PC from the ground up, we would recommend newer hardware. But if you’re looking for a quick and inexpensive performance boost for your PC, you could take a look at the other best CPUs for gaming.

back to menu ↑

1.AMD FD832EWMHKBOX

Features



OUR TAKE

AMD’s FX-series CPUs were introduced with some fanfare back in October of 2011, and after being feted at AMD’s Austin, Texas facility (since sold), we tested the then-new FX-8150. As the first consumer eight-core CPU (something Intel has only just introduced with the Core i7-5960 Haswell-E processor), the 8150 was an impressive piece of engineering, although its per-core performance wasn’t anywhere near Intel’s best, or even near Intel’s lower end. You can read our evaluation of this processor here.

At the time, AMD outlined their master plan: the then-current generation of FX processors was code-named Bulldozer. The improved, follow-on generation was called Piledriver, and we tested the Piledriver-based FX-8350 CPU here.

The third generation was supposed to be Steamroller, but as AMD relied increasingly on their low-power and mobile APU architecture code-named Vishera, the Steamroller plan faded away, and AMD announced that the FX series would not be upgraded to Steamroller.

back to menu ↑

2.AMD FX-8320E

Features



OUR TAKE

But those days seem long gone. All we get now are half-hearted revisions of increasingly elderly chips.

The FX-8320E is the perfect example of that. AMD released this chip late last year, along with the FX-8370E as a pair of lower-powered octo-core CPUs for the more power-conscious consumer.

These two chips use AMD’s Bulldozer processor tech and squeeze into a 95W TDP. They’re able to do this by utilising a lower base clock, but retaining the same Turbo clock as their non-E brethren.

back to menu ↑

3.AMD FX-Series FX-6300

Features



OUR TAKE

The first chip we had in the labs was, somewhat inevitably, the top-spec, eight-core AMD FX-8350. And well received it was too. But by virtue of only being a little cheaper than the excellent Intel i5-3570K, it was almost pricing itself out of the market.

The one that we’ve been interested in getting our techy mitts on is this six-core FX-6300. It’s almost the perfect sweet spot for budget gaming CPUs.

The original FX-6200 impressed us recently with its combination of bargain price, impressive multi-threading performance and serious overclocking chops too. In fact, you could push it up to almost the same CPU performance as quad-core king, the i5-3570K.

back to menu ↑

4.AMD FX-Series FX-8350

Features



OUR TAKE

The FX-8350 is a decent chip for users who want a midrange CPU for productivity tasks, or who know their software can take full advantage of the chip’s eight cores. It’s a better CPU than the FX-8150 it replaces, and AMD has done a good job of fixing some of the problems of last year’s FX-8150.

Its value proposition is improved if the end-user is planning to purchase or already owns a separate, discrete GPU—the integrated graphics processors in AMD’s APUs and Intel’s Ivy Bridge chips aren’t power houses, but they’re more than capable of handling basic gaming and other tasks.

back to menu ↑

5.AMD FD8350FRHKBOX

Features



OUR TAKE

Can a 4-year-old AMD CPU really make a mark on today’s CPU market? The FX-8350 – with the Wraith Cooler – retails much cheaper compared with several Intel processors, only costing more than the Core i3 lineup. And, this is probably a major reason why it still continues to garner a lot of support from gamers and enthusiasts alike. But, is there a reason today to consider this processor? That’s what we try and figure out.

First off, let’s take a quick look at what comprises the FX-8530 in the hardware specs department. To start with, this is a physical 8 core processor that operates at a base clock speed of 4GHz and naturally boosts to 4.2GHz. That is pretty impressive on paper. Like other FX series AMD processors, it does not come bundled with an integrated graphics card but the money saved on purchasing this processor can get you a decent graphics card albeit with a little more cash influx.

back to menu ↑

6.AMD FX 8-Core

Features



OUR TAKE

The consumer CPU market has changed a bit since then. In the interim, we did see and cover the debut of some lesser FX chips, such as the AMD FX-4130 in early 2013, but the emphasis there was on lower price points.

There was just one high-performance blip on the AMD FX radar between then and now: the brief flare of the FX-9000-series processors. Two FX-9000 chips rolled out to modest fanfare in 2013, in the form of a top-end FX-9590 and a step-down FX-9370 variant.

back to menu ↑

7.AMD FX 4350

Features



OUR TAKE

It’s a surprisingly capable CPU, and although it lacks the extra cores that the FX-6300 has, it still does a really good job of being a budget gaming platform. What’s more, the FX-4350 only costs more than the FX-6300. So in instances where more gigahertz count and for better single-core performance, the FX-4350 is a better buy than the FX-6300. However, if you require multi-core performance on a budget, the FX-6300 is where the smart money is at present.

As for benchmarks, the FX-4350 did reasonably well. The multi-core performance was always going to be less than the FX-6300 from the same price range, but its single-core scores were better. The Cinebench R15 singlecore score was a good 97, while the multi-core score of 392 could be better. The PassMark version 8 overall score was a reasonable 5,298 and the single-core score was 1,522. As before, we ran the benchmarks using the stock clock speeds of the processor.

back to menu ↑

8.AMD FX-6300

Features



OUR TAKE

The first chip we had in the labs was, somewhat inevitably, the top-spec, eight-core AMD FX-8350. And well received it was too. But by virtue of only being a little cheaper than the excellent Intel i5-3570K, it was almost pricing itself out of the market.

The one that we’ve been interested in getting our techy mitts on is this six-core FX-6300. It’s almost the perfect sweet spot for budget gaming CPUs.

The original FX-6200 impressed us recently with its combination of bargain price, impressive multi-threading performance and serious overclocking chops too. In fact, you could push it up to almost the same CPU performance as quad-core king, the i5-3570K.

back to menu ↑

9.AMD FD4300WMHKBOX

Features



OUR TAKE

back to menu ↑

10.AMD FX-8150 8-Core

Features



OUR TAKE

This first chip is the vanguard of the somewhat tardy Bulldozer technology and is this top-of-the-line AMD FX chip, code-named Zambezi. This is the full-fat, eight-core AMD super-chip running at a not inconsiderable 3.6GHz straight out the box.

The FX moniker isn’t a new one for AMD chips.

The last time we saw it used for its high-end parts was in the 90nm Athlon 64 FX-74 in late 2006. It’s been reborn this year to cover the first in what AMD hopes will be a long line of Bulldozer-based CPUs.

back to menu ↑

Best Cpu for Am3+ – BUYER’S GUIDE

Cores

A processor is comprised of multiple cores, which are essentially processors inside the processor. Each of these cores is capable of taking on multiple tasks at once. They work together to provide more power for faster processing.

Four cores should be just about enough, but if your requirement demands more power, you can opt-out for units with more cores.

Threads

Threads refer to the number of processes that a chip can deal with at once. In general, it should be the same as the number of cores in your CPU. However, some powerful CPUs offer multithreading. This means a single core can produce two threads. You will have better multitasking performance from more threads.

Cache

The CPU cache is the memory that is utilized to speed up the access of data from a computer’s hard disk or RAM. It decreases the average time that takes to access memory. You will find caches in three different formats. The L1 offers the fastest operation, but it doesn’t have much room for data storage.

You will find the L2 to have more room, but it operates much slower. The L3 offers the most space by sacrificing speed, so it’s quite sluggish.

Clock Speed

Clock speed is simply a measure of how fast a chip can operate. Naturally, the higher is faster and, of course, better. It’s evaluated in gigahertz or GHz. CPUs come with different clock speed settings. They automatically set the clock speed depending on the tasks and the unit’s temperature.

Some CPUs offer an overclocking feature, which allows you to push the speed of the chip to operate even faster than specified.

Cooling

CPUs produce a lot of heat in operation. This heating can lead to the damage of the CPU unless it’s controlled. That’s why your CPU should have a decent cooling system to reduce the temperature to prevent heat inflicted damage.

AM3+ CPUs come with a very effective cooling system. However, it won’t hurt to be extra cautious.

Motherboard

Make sure that your motherboard is designed to support your choice of AM3+ CPU. Every motherboard comes with a CPU socket, but they aren’t made to be compatible with all the CPU models. Therefore, you must make sure that your motherboard has the socket that matches your choice of CPU.

Another thing you must ensure is that your motherboard must have the correct chipset that can accommodate to your CPU. Otherwise, your motherboard won’t be able to handle your CPU at all.

Power Source

You must make sure that your power connection is safe and secure. The cable that bridges the connection between your power supply and the motherboard must be long enough. Many CPUs require an immense amount of energy, so you should get a power supply that is strong enough to provide adequate power.

back to menu ↑

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is the Best Budget AMD Processor for Gaming?

We would recommend the AMD Ryzen 3 2200g. However, the processor comes with an am4 socket and not an am3+.

Our detailed review of the best AMD processor for gaming shows that the Ryzen 3 is far better than its Intel counterpart in gaming because it is shipped with Vega graphics as standard.

Are AM3+ Processors Good for Gaming?

If you’re building a gaming PC from scratch, Intel processors are the way to go. However, if multithreaded performance is the most important priority, Ryzen processors are better. Gaming experience takes a slight hit but multithreaded performance is far superior.

The only time an FX processor or any am3+ processor makes sense is if you already have the K10 hardware and don’t want to upgrade your PC for the next two or three years.

What coolers do I need for AM3+ processors?

am3+ processors are notorious for their high power consumption, partly because they are built on old manufacturing processes.

However, one cooler doesn’t fit all needs. If you don’t plan on overclocking your processor, an air cooler should do just fine. The exception, at least in this list, is the AMD FX 9590 which needs a water cooler to run on stock speeds as well.

back to menu ↑

WRAP UP

Best Cpu for Am3+ –  It’s been four to five years since the introduction of AM3+ processors. In the technology-world, that’s a lot. And yet, the best AM3+ processors are in demand to this day.

Why?

With the Ryzen series, AMD gained mainstream parity with Intel. However, AMD had the support of a large number of enthusiasts even before this, thanks to the fact that they offered more physical cores and were relatively inexpensive.

The Ryzen series is now rapidly becoming a practical, viable choice for many casual users as well. Apart from the gaming community, AMD has got a thumbs up from all corners of the market.

Gabed.net