Best Cpu for Blender

Best Cpu for Blender – If you are an avid blender user or a beginner looking to create a PC build for your work, then having a first hand knowledge of what CPU to go for is essential.

Professional software like Blender are highly reliant on CPU for all of the activities. In this article, we reviewed some of the best CPU for blender.

We highlighted mostly high performance and workstation processors but also touched a bit on mainstream CPUs for beginners.

ROUND UP

back to menu ↑

1.Intel Core i9-10900K

Features



OUR TAKE

Intel’s Core i9-10900K still doesn’t match AMD’s halo 16-core 32-thread Ryzen 9 3950X in terms of threaded performance. Instead, the 10900K competes with the 12-core 24-thread Ryzen 9 3900X in terms of both performance and price, but Intel’s chip has the highest power consumption we’ve seen recently on the mainstream desktop.

Intel pushes the 10900K’s TDP envelope up to 125W (a 30W gen-on-gen increase), but that’s only a measure of base power consumption. Intel rates the processor for 250W at peak performance, and we even measured peaks as high as 325W at out-of-the-box settings. Naturally, that results in a lot of heat.

back to menu ↑

2.AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Features



OUR TAKE

Featuring 32 cores and 64 threads, this chip is, at the moment, the crème de la crème of the high-end desktop market, and for anyone who relies on programs that require as many cores and as much horsepower as possible, it’s the silicon to pine for.

Its single-core results are unremarkable, but for its intended use—crushing core-aware tasks—the Threadripper 3970X and its surrounding platform (anchored by the new TRX40 chipset) shatter multicore records. It’s a worthy successor to both the Threadripper 2970WX (which we tested) and Threadripper 2990WX (which we didn’t), and it brings the heat to Intel’s competing silicon, notably the spanking-new Core i9-10980XE Extreme Edition.

It earns PCMag’s Editors’ Choice as one of the best CPUs in the high-end-desktop (HEDT) world for content creators, massive multitaskers, and scenarios that require titanic amounts of device bandwidth and memory access.

back to menu ↑

3.AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Features



OUR TAKE

This year’s third-generation refresh of AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper CPU line is a big one, bringing new technologies, new approaches, and new levels of performance to what were already some of the fastest high-end desktop CPUs in the business. On AMD’s, ahem, “lower end” of this decidedly high-end desktop (HEDT) market segment is the  Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.

This 24-core processor doesn’t carry the same stinging  price of its bigger brother the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, but it still delivers a lot of performance for your dollar. If you’re just trying to get your work done quickly, instead of really quickly, the Threadripper 3960X is a nice compromise for all your multicore multitasking needs, if you’re willing to jump into an all-new platform for your next major PC build or upgrade.

back to menu ↑

4.AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Features



OUR TAKE

We’re breaking out the firepower today, unleashing some of the fastest data center processors in the world to put AMD’s claims to the test, including head-to-head comparisons with a dual-socket Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 server (56C/112T), and both single- and dual-socket AMD EPYC Rome server platforms (128C/256T). We also include the relevant mainstream and HEDT competitors, too.

The first- and second-gen Ryzen chips spurred a slow shift for mainstream desktop PCs, but AMD’s fast move to the 7nm process and Zen 2 with the Ryzen 3000 chips opened up a new level of performance that caught its rival Intel flat-footed, particularly in the high-end desktop market.

As a result, Intel recently ceded the upper echelons of the HEDT market to the Threadripper 3000 series and resigned itself to slashing gen-on-gen pricing on its new Cascade Lake-X models to slow AMD’s advance.

back to menu ↑

5.AMD Ryzen 3995WX

Features



OUR TAKE

Ever since the AMD EPYC 7001 series and Ryzen Threadripper launched in 2017, the big question has been when will AMD finally get into the professional workstation market. While there are many consumer systems that aspire to be workstations as core counts have risen, the workstation market is largely dominated by Lenovo, HP, and Dell. These three vendors have workstations that often are rackmount convertible and are much closer to servers with GPUs than they are traditional desktops.

For over a decade, this market has belonged to Intel and today, we are taking a look at the top-end processor powering the first non-Xeon professional workstation system from one of those vendors in a long time. This is our AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX review.

back to menu ↑

6.AMD YD297XAZAFWOF

Features



OUR TAKE

back to menu ↑

7.Intel Core i9-10850K

Features



OUR TAKE

When a company like Intel creates a CPU design, the process of manufacturing brings about variation on the quality of the product. Some cores will only reach a certain frequency, while others have surprisingly good voltage characteristics.

Two goals of processor design are minimizing this variance, but also shifting the peak higher, all while controlling how much of the silicon is actually useable. This is part of the magic of ‘binning’, the process of filtering the silicon into different ‘bins’ for applicability to a given product. It is through this process that the Core i9-10850K exists, albeit reluctantly.

back to menu ↑

8.Intel Core i7-11700K

Features



OUR TAKE

To start off, if you’d prefer a deeper dive into all the 11th Generation goodness we’ve got to spare (including info on motherboard compatibility and cost of adoption), head on over to our review of the Core i9-11900K flagship for all the details.

For now, here’s how the various CPUs in the “Rocket Lake” lineup shake out. (Note that for legibility’s sake we’ve left out the low-power 35-watt “T” versions of these chips, which will be of interest mostly to OEMs.)

back to menu ↑

9.Intel Core i5-10600K

Features



OUR TAKE

The Core i5 and Ryzen 5 segments comprise the bulk of sales to the ever-growing cadre of gamers and enthusiasts looking for the best bang for the buck, so success here is key.

The Core i5-10600K’s combination of a higher thread count at similar pricing to the previous-gen, high stock clock frequencies, palatable power consumption, and agile overclockability cooks up a winner for the gaming and enthusiast crowds.

Intel even reduced the gap in threaded workloads like productivity tasks. For gamers looking for the edge of performance and enthusiasts who like to tune their processors without hideously-priced supporting components, the Core i5-10600K slots in as the new mainstream champ.

back to menu ↑

10.AMD Ryzen 9 3950X

Features



OUR TAKE

AMD’s Ryzen family has completely redefined our expectations for desktop processors, and Intel has struggled to respond. The company has slowly dialed up the frequency of its aging 14nm process and added more cores, but those tweaks can’t offset the reality that AMD has moved onto a denser and more efficient 7nm process that enables higher core counts.

Of course, process technology doesn’t solve all the challenges of fielding a competitive chip, but that advantage is hard to beat when paired with a solid microarchitecture like AMD’s Zen 2.

back to menu ↑

Best Cpu for Blender – BUYER’S GUIDE

The official system requirements for blender are a bit vague. While it does highlight the architecture as well as gives you a vague idea about the core count, it does not specify any models.

This is similar to what most other professional software requirements highlight. These are intentionally made to be vague because the CPU you choose will depend mostly upon your use case.

If you are a beginner, your choice of processor would be very different compared to someone who is a seasoned Blender user and who has all the money to spend on the ultimate rig.

back to menu ↑

Single Core vs Multi Core Performance CPU for Blender

This is one of the most important factor when looking to choose the right processor for yourself.

Basically, depending upon the task that you perform or optimize your system for, you would either want to go for a processor with lower core count and a higher clock speed or with a processor with a higher core count and lower clock speed.

For instance, it is noted that for viewport playback performance, sculpting, Viewport physics simulation, then a processor with a higher SINGLE-Core performance would give you a better performance.

On the other hand, if you want to optimize your rig for rendering your work, then a processor with a higher core count would give you a faster result.

Why is this so?

That is because generally in a processor with a higher core count, the clock speed gets divided across the cores. Hence, the single core performance here dials down. This also means that tasks that rely heavily on single core/single thread performance in Blender like sculpting, take a hit.

On the other hand, tasks that rely on multi-core count like rendering, improve in performance. This is because when rendering, the work is distributed across all the cores and in the end compiled to form a complete render. So the higher the cores you have, the more simultaneous “workers” you have to put the render together.

So in short, for better viewport playback, animation and physics performance, go for a better single core performance at a given budget. For better rendering performance, go for a higher core count at a given budget.

In the following text we will review some of the best processors for blender. Keep in mind that this list disregards entry level and most mid range processors. This list mainly looks into high performance and workstation grade CPUs.

back to menu ↑

Frequently Asked Questions

back to menu ↑

Does Blender use GPU or CPU?

Blender uses both, and you can switch from CPU to GPU by accessing your Blender Render Settings → Preferences → System → Cycle Render Devices. You can choose to use CPU over GPU or both, especially if you’re using blender 2.8.

GPU renders a single tile at a time while CPU renders multiple tiles. Therefore, if you’re rendering large tile sizes such as 256×256, GPU is the better option as it’s faster. If you’re working with small tile sizes such as 16×16 or 32×32, CPU will edge GPU by a small margin.

back to menu ↑

WRAP UP

Best Cpu for Blender –  If you are building a rig for performing 3D animation on a powerful open source tool like Blender, then getting the right processor is one of the first steps in the whole processor.

However, it should be noted that the BEST CPU or the MOST POWERFUL CPUs in the market may not necessarily be the best for certain actions in blender.

Gabed.net