Best Cpu for Rendering

Best Cpu for Rendering – Finally, these were some of the best CPUs for  rendering on our list. We highly recommend going for the Intel i9 9900K  as packs more cores and clocks speed.

However, if you are on a budget, you can go for Ryzen 7 2700X that stands between the sweet spot of price and performance.

It is not only the core count that matters a lot in the 3D rendering, but there are also other factors that decide the performance of your CPU. Most of these factors are discussed below


1.AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

Pros & Cons

AMD’s second generation of Ryzen processors, built on the ‘Zen+’ architecture, are mostly the same as the previous generation, but with some optimizations to improve performance and clockspeeds.

The new 12nm LP process from GlobalFoundries provides for potentially smaller features, but AMD appears to be content to keep the same die size and transistor count—meaning the features might be smaller, but instead of shrinking the chip or adding more transistors, AMD gives the functional elements on the CPU a bit more padding. That can help with thermals, which in turn helps with clockspeeds.

2.AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Pros & Cons

Those new chips have now taken over the top ranks on our CPU Benchmark Hierarchy.

AMD’s value proposition has always been straightforward — more for less. While we typically think of AMD offering more CPU cores than Intel for less money, the strategy also applies to the company’s unrestrained feature sets for each processor, regardless of price.

That includes in-box coolers, Hyper-Threading (AMD calls it SMT), and unlocked multipliers that enable easy overclocking, all of which are features that Intel either leaves out or disables on some of its chips in the name of segmentation.

3.AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Pros & Cons

That’s especially true if you’re not the type who wants to fuss with overclocking and aftermarket coolers.

Running at stock clock speeds of 3.2GHz (base) and 3.6GHz (boost), the Ryzen 5 1600 is no slouch at less core-intensive tasks, as well. And like all Ryzen CPUs, it’s unlocked for overclocking. So the skilled and the patient will likely be able to push it closer to the 4GHz or 4.1GHz that seems to be the general limit (without exotic cooling methods like liquid nitrogen) that we’ve seen when testing other Ryzen CPUs.

4.AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Pros & Cons

It may not come close to surpassing the Ryzen 9 3900X, , especially in multi-threaded workloads, and it has inherited the Ryzen 7 2700X’s 8-core, 16-thread setup. However, it still brings to the table that raw performance for those who are on a limited budget.

With the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, you’re getting a much more affordable processor that also needs less robust cooling, and it’s simply the best processor for most people. But, don’t take our word for it; read our review to find out exactly what it’s capable of.

5.Intel Core i9-9900K

Pros & Cons

The company’s ninth-generation Core processors, otherwise known as the Coffee Lake refresh, represent another step forward in a contentious battle for desktop supremacy as the company looks to maintain its top spots on our list of Best CPUs.

Intel’s line-up matches AMD’s Ryzen core-for-core, including a new Core i9 with eight Hyper-Threaded cores (8C/16T) and the highest frequencies we’ve seen in the mainstream space. There’s also a bulked-up Core i7 armed with two extra cores, plus a revamped Core i5. AMD isn’t setting still though:

The company recently released its own new flagship, the 16-core 32-thread Ryzen 9 3950X, to fend off Intel’s new challengers.

6.Intel Core i7 i7-6800K

Pros & Cons

Now compare that with the Core i7-6800K. You might assume that this is also a 6th Gen part, but it’s actually 5th Gen Broadwell-E. And which part is faster depends on what you’re actually doing.

We’ve already covered all of the major points of interest for Broadwell-E in our monolithic review, but today we’re going to provide the executive summary, focusing on the ‘budget’ entrant for Broadwell-E, the 6-core i7-6800K. We’ll include a few charts highlighting the overall performance picture, but if you want additional low-level details we’ll refer you back to the earlier article.

7.Intel Core i7-8700

Pros & Cons

But if I did have somewhere in the region of 300 quid to spend on my CPU, then I’d almost certainly be willing to spend the extra on the i7-8700 to get those significantly quicker gaming speeds.

Really, though, I think you’d probably be much better off saving yourself some of those hard-earned pennies and getting the i5-9600K instead. Admittedly, you’ll still have to factor in the cost of a cooler with the i5-9600K, as it sadly doesn’t come with one in the box like the i7-8700, but overall I reckon it’s still much better value for money.

8.Intel CM8068403358316

Pros & Cons

9.Intel Core i9 i9-10980XE

Pros & Cons

But unlike the great leap forward we’ve seen with some of Intel’s 10th Generation Core mobile CPUs, the Core i9-10980XE is much the same chip as its previous-generation Core X predecessor, the Core i9-9980XE Extreme Edition, at least as far as specs are concerned.

The single noteworthy improvement is a major price drop to , down from  for its last-gen equivalent. While the price-to-performance ratio is therefore much better than before, 2019’s competing chips from AMD’s Ryzen family (especially the mainstream AM4 Ryzen 9 3950X at  below it, and a host of Ryzen Threadripper chips above it) are an even better value still.

10.Intel Core i7-7700K

Pros & Cons

The most immediately visible result of the optimizations is that the i7-7700K is clocked higher than the previous generation i7-6700K, and it will overclock higher. Beyond that, if you’re using the integrated HD Graphics 630, you can get lower CPU utilization for certain 4K video decoding, and in an exclusive tied to Microsoft’s Edge browser, you can stream 4K Netflix content.

I’ve also looked at gaming performance on Kaby Lake’s HD 630 integrated graphics. TL;DR: it’s not high enough that I’d recommend serious gamers forgo buying a discrete graphics card.

Best Cpu for Video Rendering

Pros & Cons

Best Cpu for Rendering – BUYER’S GUIDE

Clock Speed

This is one of the most important factors that decide the performance of a CPU when it comes to design and render 3D tasks. Higher the clock speed of a single core, the faster is the rendering.


The cache acts like the ram of the processor. Therefore the higher the number faster is the computing power of your CPU. L3 cache carries more value as compared to the L1 and L2. At this point, AMD CPUs are worth praising as they take more combines cache as compared to the Intel.

Intel VS AMD in 3D Applications

It is completely up to you to choose the processor that suits your motherboard socket. Intel is good at single-core performance and higher clock speeds, while AMD CPUs are cheaper and carry more cores.

We highly recommend AMD CPUs at this point. Firstly, the 3D rendering software in the market has a minimum clock requirement of less than 3.0 GHz, while most of the AMD CPUs are clocked over the minimum requirement. Secondly, AMD carries more core counts when compared to Intel.


Best Cpu for Rendering – Multiple Core CPUs from Intel and AMD have been great at tackling the 3D software like Blender, Maya, 3DS Max, and Cinema 4D. All of these 3D rendering software rely heavily on multiple core performance. If you are confused to pick the best CPU for 3D rendering, then this buying guide will help you choose the one that falls to your budget.