Best Ryzen Cpu for Streaming

Best Ryzen Cpu for Streaming – Conclusively, for us, the AMD Ryzen  is the clear winner. Hence, with 8 cores and a 16-thread configuration, this is a powerful machine which will provide quality streaming while also efficiently performing other functions.

However, due to its 105W TDP, it may heat up quickly. Hence, you will need to have a proper cooling system in place.  Moreover, a close follow-up is the ryzen cpu . Consequently, with the same core and thread configuration, it has a 3.6 GHz base with a turbo speed of 5 GHz.

Of course, to pick out the best CPU for streaming, you will have to do some research on your part too. However, by taking this review as your guide, you will surely find a suitable CPU.


In this section, we’re going to tell you everything you need to know in order to make an informed buying decision.

1.AMD Ryzen 3 3300X

Pros & Cons

The company’s new Ryzen 3 has Intel’s Core i3 and i5 in the crosshairs. While the Zen 2 architecture and 7nm process have given AMD the core count lead in both the mainstream and HEDT segments, its previous low-end lineup isn’t quite as impressive compared to Intel’s existing Core i3 processors.

That’s a situation AMD hopes to rectify with its Ryzen 3 series as it braces for Intel’s looming Comet Lake launch.

The 3300X serves as Ryzen 3’s new flagship part with four cores, eight threads, a 3.8 GHz base and 4.3 GHz boost, plus unified core design for a mere . AMD says this chip tackles Intel’s  six-core/thread Core i5-9400F and provides 20% more performance, which would be quite the feat.

2.AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Pros & Cons

Those new chips have now taken over the top ranks on our CPU Benchmark Hierarchy.

AMD’s value proposition has always been straightforward — more for less. While we typically think of AMD offering more CPU cores than Intel for less money, the strategy also applies to the company’s unrestrained feature sets for each processor, regardless of price.

That includes in-box coolers, Hyper-Threading (AMD calls it SMT), and unlocked multipliers that enable easy overclocking, all of which are features that Intel either leaves out or disables on some of its chips in the name of segmentation.

3.AMD Ryzen 5 1600

Pros & Cons

In short, video editors or digital media creators on a tight budget who want to cut rendering times should put this chip on their short list for their next build. That’s especially true if you’re not the type who wants to fuss with overclocking and aftermarket coolers.

Running at stock clock speeds of 3.2GHz (base) and 3.6GHz (boost), the Ryzen 5 1600 is no slouch at less core-intensive tasks, as well. And like all Ryzen CPUs, it’s unlocked for overclocking. So the skilled and the patient will likely be able to push it closer to the 4GHz or 4.1GHz that seems to be the general limit (without exotic cooling methods like liquid nitrogen) that we’ve seen when testing other Ryzen CPUs.

4.AMD Ryzen 3 3100

Pros & Cons

If the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X is the desktop processor that blurs the line between a great budget gaming CPU and a solid budget content-creation engine, the $99 Ryzen 3 3100 is the “lite” version. It’s a chip that shores up the low end of AMD’s Ryzen stack as a solid pick for PC gamers who are just a Jackson short of what you’d spend on a 3300X. Does it need to exist? Maybe not, but it still has its own rare charm, and is a first: an  four-core/eight-thread processor, which is a great deal no matter which way you slice it.

In general, we’re going to recommend you go with the Ryzen 3 3300X instead, but if that  difference between the two chips is your difference-maker, the Ryzen 3 3100 is a value-minded little beastie that gets the job done almost as well. Just know that it requires a video card alongside it; it has no integrated graphics, unlike its Intel equivalents.

5.AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Pros & Cons

The Ryzen 3 3200G is one of the few AMD Ryzen chips that comes with built-in graphics processing, which means that if you’re using it in a new budget PC build, you don’t need to spend extra on a dedicated graphics card. Most integrated graphics processors (IGPs) offer basic functionality, such as the ability to display videos and run apps, but they can’t handle demanding tasks like powering multiple 4K monitors or running 3D-graphics-intensive games.

The Ryzen 3 3200G’s IGP, silicon on the die dubbed “Radeon RX Vega 8,” is more powerful than you’ll typically see in a budget processor. It can serve as a substitute for a very low-end discrete GPU, such as the Nvidia GeForce MX250. It offers both DisplayPort and HDMI video-output support. (You’ll just want to check that the motherboard you’re installing it in has the appropriate video-out ports on the I/O panel. Not all do.)

6.AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Pros & Cons

AMD’s Ryzen 7 5800X slots into AMD’s Zen 3-powered product stack with eight cores and sixteen threads, serving as the mainstream workhorse of the Ryzen 5000 series processors that have taken our list of Best CPUs by storm and realigned our CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy.

Powered by the Zen 3 architecture that delivers a ~19% increase in instruction per cycle (IPC) throughput, the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers the impressive gains over the previous-gen models that we’ve come to expect, resetting our performance expectations for an eight-core processor.

7.AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Pros & Cons

Still, though, there’s more than just core counts when it comes to a mainstream processor, as single-core performance needs to be on point, especially if you’re hoping to play the best PC games.

Now, we’re asking ourselves whether or not the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X finally dethrones the Intel Core i9-9900K as the de facto ruler of the mainstream processors. Ultimately, it depends: the 3900X doesn’t reach the same single-core performance as Intel, but we’re starting to see more games adopt multi-threaded CPUs, so that doesn’t matter as much.

And, now that people are going to be buying more CPUs for Black Friday, this will make for a more heated processor battle.

8.AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Pros & Cons

But the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X may have changed all that. This CPU might just be the best available option. It’s just as capable with single-threaded tasks as it is with multi-threaded ones. AMD’s Ryzen 5000 presentation made this clear, as the company zeroed in on gaming, with creative applications taking a back seat.

Rounded out by PCIe 4.0 support, which Intel still hasn’t implemented, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X leads AMD processors to finally take the CPU crown. With it, there’s really no reason to buy an Intel processor for that gaming PC you’re building.

9.AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Pros & Cons

For one, fewer cores and threads. Though the naming scheme might seem a bit confusing, the Threadripper 3960X is, at least in spirit and core count, a successor to last year’s Threadripper 2970WX, also a 24-core CPU. While the Threadripper 3970X sports 32 cores and 64 threads, the 3960X features “only” 24 cores and 48 threads, with a total of 140MB of L2/L3 cache.

Both suck up an equal amount of power: 280 watts thermal design power (up from 250 watts in the same-core-count Threadripper 2970WX), and each features support for the same number of usable PCI Express lanes: 72, versus 64 in the previous generation of Threadrippers (already a lusty amount).


Pros & Cons

Similar to Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, two of the 2970WX’s dies aren’t connected directly to main memory. So, the CPU delivers great performance in threaded workloads that aren’t sensitive to memory throughput, but less impressive results in bandwidth-hungry applications that don’t scale well with extra cores.

AMD introduced Dynamic mode to its Ryzen Master software in an effort to minimize the architecture’s compromises, but it isn’t always effective.

Best Ryzen Cpu for Streaming – BUYER’S GUIDE

< class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">Content And Budget

In an ideal world, everyone eager to experiment with streaming has a large budget to sink into obtaining a high-end CPU. The reality of most budding streamers means that budget will have the most significant impact on what CPU they opt for. This isn’t necessarily as prohibitive as it sounds: the type of content also has a part to play in how efficient a CPU will be.

Streaming the most demanding games on a single setup PC requires a high-end CPU to match, while putting the world to rights in a cozy creator-to-audience stream is more than possible with a more affordable CPU option.

As such, we recommend curbing the natural desire to opt for the very best out there, and instead, buying within your means and for the content you plan to stream. All the CPUs above are perfectly suitable for streaming, so don’t hesitate to jump down to a lower price bracket if it suits your plans.

< class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">AMD Vs. Intel

Barring some odd quirk, you’ll be well aware of AMD and Intel’s tussle when it comes to processors. For better or worse, the retail space is dominated by the two chip powerhouses, limiting the choice of which streaming-fit CPU to one of the two. It’s not necessarily a bad thing, but choosing one camp over the other can very much feel like picking sides.

While we aren’t here to side with one or the other, they each have their strong points, and arguably the race has never been so closely fought after years of Intel leading the charge. A few years ago, the thrifty builder invariably veered towards AMD’s more competitively priced products, while those eager for all-out performance threw their cash at Intel. Intel’s dominance, especially when it comes to gaming performance, isn’t what it once was with AMD products now more or less on par, if not better (looking at you multithreading).

< class="elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default">Single/Dual PC Streaming Setup

Running a single or dual PC streaming setup places significantly different demands on the CPU and should mostly guide your final decision.

Should you fall into the dual PC camp, then you have some leeway when it comes to the chip for the PC charged with encoding and streaming video. In this case, a lower-spec and more affordable CPU is more than enough (unless you’re dipping into quality higher than 1080p), allowing you to invest in a high-end CPU for the PC used for the actual gaming.

For single PC setups, we recommend going big and spending more money on the CPU to ensure there’s enough power there to handle encoding as well as games or other CPU hungry applications you may want to incorporate into your broadcasts. Not doing so invariably leads to dropped frames and choppy in-game FPS, a perfect recipe for bleeding viewers and sapping the enjoyment out of streaming. A CPU with the chops to allocate sufficient resources to both is crucial.

Frequently Asked Questions

What CPU Should I Get for Streaming?

We have collected the best existing processors for gaming and streaming in our article at the present time. Therefore, you have an opportunity to get acquainted with the specs of each CPU and choose the best according to your requirements. If it is not enough, look through the reviews by professional streamers keeping in mind clock speed, thread count and other basic and important features of advanced CPUs. For us, AMD Ryzen 9 3950 X is the best streaming processor being a powerful machine with great features. Meanwhile, Intel Core i9-9900K can ensure stable operation when streaming at maximum quality and resolution in the most difficult games. Processing video in 4K resolution will take a minimum of time.


Best Ryzen Cpu for Streaming –  Streaming is slowly becoming a hobby for many gamers. Why play alone when you can share your gameplay with people from all over the world on Twitch, Mixer, or YouTube? Sounds fun and can get you new friends. Also, it’s cool when you have someone to share your rants with when things don’t go your way. For casual streaming, set at 720p/30fps, with a low bitrate, you can use almost any modern CPU with 4 cores and 8 threads.